Made my 17th payment to pay down the public debt of the U.S. government

I just made my 17th monthly payment to pay down the public debt of the U.S. government. It wasn't a large payment, just another $25, but it is a matter of principle, albeit mostly symbolic. It may take me another 48 billion years to pay it all down all by myself at this rate (and assuming the deficit went to zero immediately), but, as I said, it is a matter of principle and a sense of personal responsibility. It is our debt, not somebody else's.

 

According to the U.S. Treasury web site, the total public debt outstanding was $14,345,440,513,979.37, as of May 26, 2011, an increase of about $75 billion over 42 days, about $1.8 billion a day or $649 billion per year (annualized daily deficit.) As bad as that is, it is actually better than 9 of the past 12 months.

 

We have reached the statutory debt limit, but I fully expect a deal before this becomes a problem.

 

Here is what I wrote back in January 2010 when I made my first donation/gift/contribution/payment:

Everybody is whining and complaining about the ballooning debt of the U.S. government, but who is actually doing anything about it? Well, for starters, ME! Yes, that's right, I, Jack Krupansky, just did something to reduce the U.S. government debt. Really. No kidding. I actually paid down a small slice of this debt. Granted, it was a rather small slice, but a slice nonetheless. Okay, sure, it was only $20, but the point is that at least I am one of the very few people willing to stand up and DO something about the problem, rather than be one of the whiners and complainers who refuse to acknowledge that it is their debt and their problem, not just the fault of mindless politicians in Washington, D.C. After all, every politician ultimately answers to voters and most of the so-called wasteful spending of the U.S. government is simply politicians responding to the demands of their constituents (voters.) Maybe my one small contribution to paying down the debt won't really make any difference to any of those whiners and complainers, but for me it is a matter of principle. I consciously choose action rather than the inaction and lack of responsibility of the whiners and complainers.

If you have any sense of principle, you too can pay down a slice of the U.S. government debt yourself at Pay.gov. You can pay via credit card or debit transfer from a bank account.

 

So do the right thing and show all those whiners and complainers (including so-called "tax protesters") how mindless and spineless they really are. PAY DOWN THE DEBT! And that has to start at the grass roots with us individuals before politicians will ever pick up the lead.

 

For the record, the only real way out of the deficit is not to merely cut expenditures or raise taxes or some combination of the two, but through economic growth, which includes a healthy amount of immigration in addition to unemployed workers going back to work and young people entering the work force. Sure, we need to manage the federal budget more carefully as well and make difficult choices about the size of government and tax rates, but the big focus has to be on achieving sustainable economic growth. In truth, nobody, including all of the Nobel laureate economists, knows what that sustainable rate really is or how to get there. We'll stumble our way in that general direction. That's the way we do things in America.

 

Another note: A significant part of the deficit is businesses writing off losses from the financial crisis and recession as tax deductions. That may continue for awhile longer, but will gradually wind down and tax receipts from businesses will begin to pick up in the coming years.

 

-- Jack Krupansky

 

Cafe Philo in New York City next week, Thursday, 6/2: Was monotheism a source of human progress or did it lead to intolerance?

Cafe Philo in New York City will meet next week, on Thursday, June 2, 2011 for a discussion on the topic of "Was monotheism a source of human progress or did it lead to intolerance?"

 

The suggested topics for the upcoming meeting and their votes (out of 8 attendees):

1. Why do we want or need pets? (3)
2. Was monotheism a source of human progress or did it lead to intolerance? (7) *
3. Is growth compatible with sustainability? (5)
4. Is there such a thing as emergence? (3)
5. Process vs. Results. (4)
6. Is war inevitable? (4)
7. Can we make an argument for anything? (5)

I have been acting as guest moderator lately (although Bob Pan graciously filled in last time due to my being delayed due to travel.) Bernard Roy has been attending as a participant.

 

As usual, the meeting will be held from 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. in the back room at Bamiyan Afghan Restaurant at the northwest corner of Third Avenue and 26th Street in New York City. In exchange for free meeting space, it is expected that each attendee will purchase a minimum of $5 of food or drink. A glass of red wine can be had for $6 (plus tax and tip.)

 

After winding down our discussion, we entertain and vote on proposals for the topic question for the next meeting.

 

There are also usually some attendees who go across the street to McCormack's Pub for drinks and food and extended discussion after Cafe Philo, but not limited to the scheduled discussion topic.

 

There are a number of small groups in the U.S. and Europe who meet regularly to discuss topics related to philosophy. Some of these groups go by the name "Cafe Philo." There is one here in New York City that meets every two weeks, every other Thursday. It is organized and moderated by Bernard Roy, Associate Professor of Philosophy at Ramapo College of New Jersey. Each meeting focuses on a specific topic which was suggested and voted on by the participants at the last meeting.

 

-- Jack Krupansky

 

Cafe Philo in New York City in two weeks, Thursday, 5/19: Free market economy vs. socialism

Cafe Philo in New York City will meet in two weeks, on Thursday, May 19, 2011 for a discussion on the topic of "Free market economy vs. socialism."

 

The suggested topics for the upcoming meeting and their votes (out of 9 attendees):

1. Are there limits to rationalization? (2)
2. Where do we go from here? (4)
3. What makes a good generalization? (5, 4)
4. Preconceived notion vs. experience. (3)
5. Is consumption the new meaning of life? (5, 4)
6. How can judgment account for ambiguity? (4)
7. What is recognition? (2)
8. Free market economy vs. socialism. (5, 6) *
9. How much free market, how much socialism? (4)
10. Can education avoid the influence of capitalism? (5, 4)
11. The myth of the news media and us knowing local events. (2)

I have been acting as guest moderator lately. Bernard Roy has been attending as a participant.

 

As usual, the meeting will be held from 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. in the back room at Bamiyan Afghan Restaurant at the northwest corner of Third Avenue and 26th Street in New York City. In exchange for free meeting space, it is expected that each attendee will purchase a minimum of $5 of food or drink. A glass of red wine can be had for $6 (plus tax and tip.)

 

After winding down our discussion, we entertain and vote on proposals for the topic question for the next meeting.

 

There are also usually some attendees who go across the street to McCormack's Pub for drinks and food and extended discussion after Cafe Philo, but not limited to the scheduled discussion topic.

 

There are a number of small groups in the U.S. and Europe who meet regularly to discuss topics related to philosophy. Some of these groups go by the name "Cafe Philo." There is one here in New York City that meets every two weeks, every other Thursday. It is organized and moderated by Bernard Roy, Associate Professor of Philosophy at Ramapo College of New Jersey. Each meeting focuses on a specific topic which was suggested and voted on by the participants at the last meeting.

 

-- Jack Krupansky